NC Forms Index: Name the Job First
The official NC forms index is a warehouse shelf. This page is the front door: decide whether you are in an initial lane, a modification lane, or an enforcement lane before you download anything. Then remember the county layer: local rules can require steps the statewide PDF never mentions.
| If your sentence starts with... | You are probably in... |
|---|---|
| "We do not have a final order yet" | Initial / responsive lane (verify packet with county) |
| "Life changed and the old order cannot run our week" | Modification lane (dated change facts) |
| "The order is clear and they will not follow it" | Compliance documentation lane before new captions |
Initial or responsive filing
No final custody order yet, or you are answering a new action.
See forms hub for motion familiesModification
Order exists; facts changed; you need new signed terms.
NC modification overviewAOC-CV-634 motion checklist (exact form)Enforcement posture
Readable order; patterned non-compliance; build proof before new captions.
NC enforcement and contempt (overview)Optional general support: denied-time log · enforcement prep
County always layers on
After you pick a lane, run the local lookup so intake matches reality.
Local rules & county lookupRelevant North Carolina law
The statutes and appellate decisions below are the ones North Carolina courts actually apply here. Educational orientation only — not legal advice. Read the source before you rely on it.
Statutes
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.2 — Who Entitled to Custody; Terms of Custody; Visitation
An order for custody must award the child to the person, agency, organization or institution that "will best promote the interest and welfare of the child," and the court must consider all relevant factors, including acts of domestic violence between the parties, the safety of the child, and the safety of either party from domestic violence by the other. The order must include written findings of fact reflecting consideration of each of these factors and supporting the best-interest determination. Between natural or adoptive parents no presumption applies as to who will better promote the child's interest and welfare, and joint custody must be considered on either parent's request. If the court finds domestic violence occurred, it must enter orders that best protect the children and the victim party, and a party's absence or relocation because of domestic violence may not weigh against that party in deciding custody or visitation. A custody order may be modified or vacated at any time on motion and a showing of changed circumstances (G.S. 50-13.7(a)), which the courts construe as a substantial change affecting the child's welfare.
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.3 — Enforcement of Order for Custody
An order providing for the custody of a minor child “is enforceable by proceedings for civil contempt, and its disobedience may be punished by proceedings for criminal contempt, as provided in Chapter 5A, Contempt, of the General Statutes.”
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.4 — Action for Support of Minor Child
Child support must be in an amount that meets the child's reasonable needs for health, education, and maintenance, having due regard to the estates, earnings, conditions, accustomed standard of living of the child and the parties, the child care and homemaker contributions of each party, and other facts of the case. The court determines the amount by applying the presumptive statewide guidelines; on a party's request it must hear evidence and find facts on the child's reasonable needs and each parent's relative ability to provide support. The court may vary from the guidelines only if it finds by the greater weight of the evidence that applying them would not meet or would exceed the child's reasonable needs considering each parent's relative ability to pay, or would be otherwise unjust or inappropriate, and it must make findings on the criteria justifying the deviation and the basis for the amount. Support generally ends at 18, but if the child is still in primary or secondary school it continues until the child graduates, stops attending regularly, fails to make satisfactory academic progress, or reaches 20, whichever comes first, unless the court orders otherwise. If arrears remain when the support obligation ends, payments continue in the same total amount until the arrears are paid, unless the court orders otherwise.
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.5(d)(2)-(3) - Ex Parte Temporary Custody Orders
Once it has jurisdiction of the child, the court may, if the circumstances make it appropriate, enter temporary custody and support orders pending service of process or notice. But a temporary custody order that changes the child's living arrangements or changes custody shall not be entered ex parte and before service or notice unless the court finds the child is exposed to a substantial risk of bodily injury or sexual abuse, or that there is a substantial risk the child may be abducted or removed from North Carolina to evade the jurisdiction of its courts. A temporary order that requires a law enforcement officer to take physical custody of the child must be accompanied by a warrant under G.S. 50A-311. Ordinary motions for custody in a pending action require 10 days' notice, and the statute does not set how soon a hearing must follow an ex parte order; that timing is left to court rules and local practice.
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-13.7 — Modification of Order for Child Support or Custody
An order of a North Carolina court for custody of a minor child may be modified or vacated at any time, upon a motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances by either party or anyone interested, subject to the UCCJEA jurisdiction provisions in G.S. 50A-201, 50A-202, and 50A-204. A child-support order may likewise be modified or vacated at any time upon a motion in the cause and a showing of changed circumstances, subject to the limitations of G.S. 50-13.10. When another state's court entered the custody or support order, a North Carolina court may, after gaining jurisdiction and upon a showing of changed circumstances, enter a new order that modifies or supersedes it. The statute does not itself say how significant the change must be, whether it must affect the child's welfare, or how the best interests of the child are weighed on modification.
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50A-204 - Temporary Emergency Jurisdiction
A North Carolina court has temporary emergency jurisdiction if the child is present in North Carolina and has been abandoned, or it is necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child, or a sibling or parent of the child, is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse. If there is no prior enforceable custody order and no case has been filed in a state with jurisdiction under G.S. 50A-201 through 50A-203, the emergency order stays in effect until such a state issues an order, and becomes a final determination if it so provides and no such case is filed, making North Carolina the home state. If there is a prior order or a pending case in a state with jurisdiction, the North Carolina order must specify a period adequate for the parent to obtain an order from that state and lasts only until that order is obtained or the period expires. On learning of a proceeding or order in the state with jurisdiction, the court shall immediately communicate with that court.
- N.C. Gen. Stat. § 5A-21 - Civil Contempt; Imprisonment to Compel Compliance
Failure to comply with a court order, including a custody, visitation or child support order, is a continuing civil contempt only as long as all four conditions exist: the order remains in force, its purpose may still be served by compliance, the noncompliance is willful, and the person is able to comply or to take reasonable measures that would enable compliance. A person in civil contempt may be imprisoned as long as the contempt continues; for failure to pay child support, or failure to perform an act that does not require paying a money judgment (such as obeying a custody or visitation order), the person may be held as long as the contempt continues without further hearing, but in other cases each commitment may not exceed 90 days for the same act of disobedience, with a total cap of 12 months and a de novo hearing, with findings that all four conditions still exist, before any recommitment. A person found in civil contempt may not be fined and may not be found in criminal contempt for the same conduct.
Key cases
- Evans v. Evans, 138 N.C. App. 135 (N.C. App. 2000)
A custodial parent's planned move, like remarriage, is not by itself a substantial change in circumstances, and an order changing custody if the parent relocates must be supported by findings about the effect of the move on the child himself; a finding that the move would adversely affect the relationship between the other parent and the child, with no other findings about its effect on the child, does not support modification. The trial court must also expressly conclude that the custody award best promotes the child's interest and welfare, weighing factors such as those in Ramirez-Barker v. Barker, because the child's welfare is the polar star and if the child's welfare will be better promoted by removal from the state, the court should permit it. The court vacated the order conditionally shifting primary custody to the father if the mother moved to Maryland and remanded for detailed findings, and it held a trial judge may not retain exclusive jurisdiction over future custody hearings. The change in circumstances need not be adverse; one that is or is likely to be beneficial may also warrant a change. Under Shipman v. Shipman, 357 N.C. 471 (2003), the trial court must find a connection between the change in circumstances and the child's welfare unless the effect is self-evident.
- McKyer v. McKyer, 632 S.E.2d 828 (N.C. App. 2006)
A court may base child support on a parent’s earning capacity rather than actual income only on a showing that the parent acted in bad faith — deliberately depressing income or in deliberate disregard of the support obligation (which indifference to the children’s needs can establish); the court must also make specific findings supporting the amount imputed.
- Ramirez-Barker v. Barker, 107 N.C. App. 71 (N.C. App. 1992)
A custodial parent's proposed move is decided as a custody modification, and a change in the custodial parent's residence is not by itself a substantial change in circumstances; the parent seeking modification bears the burden of showing a substantial change in circumstances affecting the child's welfare, and competent evidence that the relocation will likely or probably adversely affect the child supports that finding if the move occurs. The court's further statement that a relocation must be allowed whenever no adverse effect is shown is no longer the law: Pulliam v. Smith, 348 N.C. 616 (1998), expressly disapproved Ramirez-Barker to the extent it required adversity, holding that a change that is, or is likely to be, beneficial to the child may also warrant a change in custody, and Shipman v. Shipman, 357 N.C. 471 (2003), requires findings connecting the change to the child's welfare unless the effect is self-evident. Once a substantial change is shown, neither party bears the burden on best interests, which is more inquisitorial than adversarial and committed to the trial court's broad discretion; in a relocation case the court may consider, among other factors, the advantages of the move in improving the child's life, the custodial parent's motives, the likelihood that parent will comply with visitation orders once outside North Carolina's jurisdiction, the integrity of the other parent in resisting the move, and the likelihood a realistic visitation schedule can preserve and foster the relationship with the noncustodial parent, and when the advantages outweigh the disadvantages the court is within its discretion to permit the move. The court affirmed an order that kept custody with the mother if she stayed but shifted school-year custody to the father if she moved to California, because the evidence supported a finding that the child needed both parents' involvement under the existing arrangement.
- Shipman v. Shipman, 357 N.C. 471 (2003)
A custody order between two natural parents may be modified only if the moving party shows a "substantial change of circumstances affecting the welfare of the child" (N.C. Gen. Stat. 50-13.7(a)); the change need not be adverse, because a change that is, or is likely to be, beneficial to the child may also warrant a change in custody. The trial court must first decide whether a substantial change occurred and whether it affected the child's welfare; if either answer is no, no modification can be ordered. If both are found, the court may modify only if it further concludes that a change in custody is in the child's best interests. Where the effect on the child is not self-evident (for example, a parent's move or cohabitation), there must be evidence directly linking the change to the child's welfare and findings of fact on that connection. The statute itself requires only 'changed circumstances'; the 'substantial change affecting the welfare of the child' standard is the Supreme Court's construction (Pulliam v. Smith, 348 N.C. 616 (1998)).
Related guides
More North Carolina forms
State guides (overview)
General support (not North Carolina-specific)
Official index
- NC Courts forms index: https://www.nccourts.gov/documents/forms
- NC Courts local rules & forms: https://www.nccourts.gov/documents/local-rules-and-forms
Index orientation FAQs
Why not open the forms index first and click randomly?
Because custody searches panic-download. If you have not named your job, you will grab a modification motion when your facts are compliance-shaped, or vice versa.
What is the one-sentence decision parents skip?
Whether you need new order language, or whether you need the court to address someone ignoring existing language. That split changes exhibits and captions.
How is this different from the /north-carolina/forms hub?
The hub routes MCC readers through modify, county lookup, and index layers. This page is the orientation shelf for people who landed on the statewide directory first.
MyCustodyCoach is not a law firm. Court rules, fees, and form versions change by county; confirm what applies to your case with official court resources or counsel you hire.